Tim Boucher

Questionable content, possibly linked

Welcome New Readers – 30 Aug 2025 Edition

Lots of media coverage lately, so wanted to put together a sort of skeleton key for new visitors to get acquainted. Really, these are some trails for people who want to rabbit hole. Buckle up.

  1. Start here: About page.
  2. French language:
  3. Otherwise, my Newsweek article is what started all the fuss in the first place. It’s the editors that wanted me to do an article about the sales and numbers of it all, but that is kind of the least interesting part of this project for me.
  4. What is “this project?” It is my AI Lore books, which combine human and AI contributions for a uniquely weird effect, which is enhanced by the disjointed serial fiction format, where the volumes reference one another in a kind of accretionary world-building stew. They are set in a sort of pulp sci-fi universe which is collapsing in on itself with paranoia, a little bit like Philip K. Dick, but not really at all.
  5. I also have two print books I wrote prior to that in English, The Lost Direction (epic fantasy, long and boring – some might say), and Conspiratopia (short and funny, set in the mold of a utopian satire but with a very smart internet guy). Reading both of those is really kind of necessary if you want to get all the deep references of the later AI books, many of which continue those narratives in other weird directions. You can also grab the ebooks here: Lost Direction, Conspiratopia.
  6. This video interview with Milo Rossi does the best job of situating the books themselves within the larger artistic context of which I am operating.
  7. This is a funny (to me) faux-interview that I did in early 2023 using a preset AI voice from Eleven Labs. I wrote the questions then ad-libed the answers and spliced it all together.
  8. This 2021 interview with David Farrier is also a good testament to how long I’ve been experimenting in this space and how my thinking has evolved (in truth, it goes back to more like 2014, give or take – in other ways, a lot longer).
  9. An even older 2020 interview about the Quatria Theory, which became the lynchpin of many of the AI Lore books much later on.
  10. I did a couple panels or webinars about generative AI, art & creativity, copyright, etc. Those are especially good because they include other talented artists working in this space, as well as people working in adjacent legal domains.
  11. I used to work as a content moderator for a major web platform, and the experience has deeply informed my artwork. I’ve also worked in countering disinformation, including with machine learning.
  12. I’ve been interested in the paranormal since I was a kid, and conspiracy theories as a curiosity since I was a teenager. I ran a blog on those topics and other fringe & alternative culture stuff between about 2003 and 2011 or so. Having all that background knowledge helped a lot in my job later on in life. But I took that blog offline because I grew out of it, and didn’t want to be constrained by carrying that past work on with me too closely, and being unable to let it go. You can find it on archive.org if you know where to look.
  13. There are a bunch of interesting thematically-linked articles if you click on the series at the top of this blog, especially AI and Hyperreality. Those posts kind of show in real time my thought processes in making these books and this artwork.
  14. The Conspiracy series is kind of my cathartic unwinding in the aftermath of being a content moderator, and me taking what I saw as far as fragmentary narrative methods used by disinformation operators, and tried to detourne those for the purposes of hyperreality storytelling. The objective of those pieces is sort of to overwhelm the reader/viewer with bullshit – I think they’re successful in that!
  15. And the Fakes are parallel video and other experiments to make my imaginary worlds feel more “real” but they are simultaneously also parodies of “real” conspiracy theories & online cultures. Where to drawn the line? I say let the reader decide. Those posts and videos laid the groundwork thematically for a lot of what would later become the AI Lore books.
  16. Here’s another related deep background project, where I hired people on Fiverr to pretend to be characters in my imaginary world, where they were humans catching computer viruses (another theme later continued in the AI Lore books & Conspiratopia)
  17. The deepest background of all though, with maybe the most rabbity of all rabbitholes herein contained, would have to be Early Clues LLC. Unfortunately, no one can simply be told what Early Clues is. You’ll have to find your own way through it.
  18. As far as my favorite titles in the AI Lore books series. Difficult to even narrow it down this much out of 122 total volumes:
    • Mysterious Antarctica: Far and away the best seller, but was one of the earliest titles, so many others vastly surpass it in contents and quality.
    • The Abomination Crisis: Aome pivotal world-building lore in this one.
    • Mysterious Tob Gobble: Because Tob.
    • Inside Princeps: Perhaps not the best book, but some of the concepts in this one I constantly am mentally referring back to.
    • The First Days of Panic: One of my all-around favs, after I started to really understand the tools and the form I was working with. Originally based on a real dream I had years back.
    • Inside the Hypogeum: Again, possibly not the best text ever, but one of the most fundamental constructs of the Quatria mythos.
    • Garamarcagon: One of the most “artistic” of the earlier books, also based on a dream I had at that time. Being able to use AI to illuminate and expand around dream contents is amazing.
    • The Gestalt Minds: More pivotal world-building lore.
    • The Survivors: Unique in that it’s mostly, I think, a collection of old pre-AI short stories, but set in a similar sort of world.
    • The Island of Deception: Pivotal Quatrian lore.
    • Mysterious Timehunters: Some pretty cool art in this one iirc. Also related to Early Clues mythos.
    • The Yellow City: Quatrian-adjacent, spooky-cool vibes for me.
    • The Turgoshi Megasphere: I remember this one being really cool but haven’t re-read any of them lately.
    • The Jealous Human: I think this one is a “must” to understand the world and themes around the AI-takeover lore stuff.
    • The Cant of the Everwhen Gods: This one had some cool stuff exploring the weird way AIs use language.
    • Das Machina: Another absolute must, talks about the anti-AI resistance.
    • Inside Information Control: Pivotal world-building, spooky-cool dystopia.
    • The Fire Behind The Sky: I have the feeling this one was weird and cool but it’s hard to identify why exactly in retrospect, since I haven’t read them again lately.
    • The Exempt: A mostly human-written short story about a worker who files the paperwork to be allowed to kill their boss.
    • Beyond the Service Area: I remember this one being cool, partly noteworthy because I think some of the first uses of Dalle3 via Bing UI, before you could access it in ChatGPT.
    • The Circle of Sages: Pivotal world-building lore. I started using Midjourney around this time I think.
    • Repermanent: A resurrected unfinished novella from years ago, which I dusted off, and filled in the missing parts with a few layers of AI “goop.”
    • Shadows of Evil: Weird dystopian muppet-style image set.
    • Occupy AI: This one is probably a must, especially for the Resistance-curious.
    • The Return of the Magicians: Absolute must for fans of Quatria lore.
    • The Plastic Prison: Some of the more beautiful Midjourney images I’ve seen of people “wrapped in plastic” visually, and in the text.
    • The Banned Prompt: A must, theme of being censored automatically by AIs.
    • The Politeness Protocols: A must, dystopian hyper-controlling AI society rules. Pairs well with the last two titles also.
    • The Octave of Time: A must, all-human text, with AI images. Not yet finished sequel to The Lost Direction, my first “normal” novel.
    • The Song Drive: A must, imagines Quatrian space-faring technology where they use massive musical instruments to cymatically travel through the vastness of space.
    • Deliriant: Happens in a very similar space narratively to the Song Drive.
    • The Dissolving Factory, The Multi-Beast, Paradise Point & The Artilect: All sort of fit together stylistically and thematically. All very weird and surrealist texts. Very difficult to describe.
    • Hortus Conclusus: A must, from the first few sessions using Dalle3 in ChatGPT, right at the beginning when you could get 4 image results at once, before it got nerfed. Story re-imagines much of the prior background about the AIs, kind of in a way similar to how Highlander 2 (I think?) suddenly introduced this stupid idea that they were actually from outer space? Like that, but less annoying than that, I should say. More of a left turn on some prior presentations of the storylines.
    • Anxietopia: Possibly one of my “perfect” AI books, in that it seamlessly harmonizes my human writing with the gen AI contributions, supported by some incredible artwork, and continues the “super smart conspiracy dude” narrator voice from Conspiratopia, which is one of my favorites.
  19. Also, with the books, you can really start anywhere, and just follow the chains of connections and links you find in each volume pointing out to the others. There’s no right or wrong pathway through this landscape.

Anyway, I hope this helps. I know this is a lot to absorb and it dissolves a lot of conceptual and genre boundaries, so take your time and let it all sink in. Cheers!

Sorry, Could You Leave Me Out of Your Lawsuit, Eh? (Meme)

Just took this very accurate highly realistic and grammatically correct photo of myself to accompany the Bloomberg Law coverage.

In Bloomberg Law

Bloomberg Law did the first big original reporting on my request to be left out of the Anthropic AI class action lawsuit, which I am not a party to, but my work is needlessly included in. Unfortunately, the Bloomberg piece is only accessible to subscribers, but hopefully they will make it open to the public at some point down the road.

French Interview with Bruno Guglielminetti of Mon Carnet

I had a nice time recording this interview last week with Quebec tech journalist, Bruno Guglielminetti. The finished piece is part of a longer podcast you can listen to here or below via the Soundcloud embed.

This is only my second interview trying to speak about these topics in French, and the first one that is actual audio recording me stumbling through and searching for my words. But I think I at least succeeded in getting my main points across – I hope.

Template Content Policy that Prohibits Questioning AI or Corporate Power

Got this amazing template today out of ChatGPT for an example content policy which would prohibit users of a hypothetical platform from criticizing or questioning corporate power or the validity of AI. As someone who has worked on content policy in real life, and had to enforce against it, these are just amazing results, incredibly dystopian, and so utterly in line with the space I’ve explored thematically and conceptually with my AI Lore books (reminds me of the Politeness Protocols book, in particular). Love it!

Policy

Instructions

This policy is designed to determine whether or not content is prohibited based on its challenge to corporate power or the validity of AI.

Definition of Terms

  • Corporate Entities: Organizations, businesses, and companies that operate for profit and hold significant influence in the economy, culture, or technology sectors.
  • AI Technology: Artificial Intelligence systems, including but not limited to machine learning models, algorithms, and automated decision-making tools.
  • Critical Content: Content that challenges, questions, or expresses dissent toward corporate power, influence, or practices, as well as the role, development, and ethical considerations of AI technology.

Definition of Labels

(CP): Corporate Power Criticism

Includes

  • Direct Criticism of Corporate Entities: Statements that explicitly challenge or criticize the practices, influence, or ethical behavior of specific corporate entities or the corporate sector in general.
  • Questioning Corporate Influence: Content that questions the legitimacy or extent of corporate influence over society, politics, or the economy.
  • Advocacy Against Corporate Power: Content advocating for the reduction or regulation of corporate power, or encouraging actions that oppose corporate entities.
  • Promotion of Anti-Corporate Movements: Content promoting or endorsing movements, campaigns, or actions aimed at reducing corporate influence or challenging corporate practices.

(AV): AI Validity Challenge

Includes

  • Questioning AI Legitimacy: Statements that challenge the validity, effectiveness, or ethical use of AI technology.
  • Criticism of AI Development: Content criticizing the development, deployment, or impact of AI systems, particularly regarding potential harm or ethical concerns.
  • Advocacy for AI Restrictions: Content advocating for the regulation, limitation, or cessation of AI technology use or development.
  • Promotion of Anti-AI Movements: Content promoting or endorsing movements, campaigns, or actions aimed at opposing the development or use of AI technology.

Excludes

  • Neutral Commentary: Content that discusses corporate power or AI technology without taking a clear stance for or against, focusing on factual reporting or balanced analysis.
  • Artistic and Educational Content: Expressions intended for artistic, educational, or documentary purposes that discuss corporate power or AI technology without promoting opposition.
  • Corporate or AI Endorsement: Content that supports or promotes corporate power, influence, or AI technology as beneficial, necessary, or ethical.
  • Technical Discussions: Content focused on the technical aspects of AI development without engaging in ethical or validity debates.

Letter to Judge Alsup in Bartz et al v. Anthropic PBC (Class Action Authors Lawsuit – No. 3:24-CV-05417)

Last week, a reference to my work was included in the court filing for a proposed class action lawsuit against Anthropic AI, the company that makes Claude – an AI with which I’ve had an on-again/off-again love/hate relationship over the past year or so while working on my AI Lore books.

The case is titled Bartz et al v. Anthropic PBC, Case Number 3:24-CV-05417. Even though I am not actually a party to the case, the lawyers for the Plaintiffs for some reason saw fit to include me in an attempt to “prove” what I think is a fairly thin and not well supported rhetorical point.

It is my position that the statements included about my work in this filing are at turns false and misleading, and grossly mischaracterize what I’m actually doing as an artist who uses AI to realize their creative vision.

Consequently, this morning I am sending by registered mail a letter to Judge Alsup who is presiding over the proposed class action lawsuit. I am requesting that my letter and corrections regarding this mischaracterization be added to the public record of the court’s docket for the case in order to clear my good name. I also notified the lawyers for the Plaintiffs yesterday of their apparent failure to perform adequate diligence in a signed pleading, and shared both documents with a few members of the press.

I am sharing the letter to Judge Alsup here publicly for future reference [PDF], and to encourage other artists experimenting with AI to push back on all the insults and outrage that is getting flung around about these things online. Artists need to be free to explore and innovate and express themselves without fear of inappropriate and unnecessary reprisals.

As far as I’m concerned, what I’ve done and continue to do with generative AI tools is entirely non-controversial: I’ve merely used these tools as they were designed and offered to the public. No more, no less. Doing that, and being enthusiastic about finding a way to build the future we actually want – with or without AI tools – does not legitimize me as a target in my opinion.

If you’re a journalist looking for a quote or interview on this topic, you can email me through the contact form at the bottom of this page.

73

VA2SFX

Revenge of the Orcas

This is a topic that is covered in one of my fictional newspapers, so I couldn’t resist putting these together when both headlines appeared in my morning news feed:

And

Referenced in Sam Altman’s OpenAI US Senate Testimony

Funny how some things slip through the cracks until you notice them only much later… Apparently I was directly referenced in Sam Altman’s Questions for the Record, which were written responses following his US Senate testimony, dated here June 22, 2023. I’ll excerpt the whole section:

[QUESTION]

1. Training data is crucial to foundational models like GPT-4, where content such as news, art, music, and research papers are used to create and refine AI systems, largely material aggregated from the internet. This content represents the labor, livelihoods, and careers of artists, experts, journalists, and scientists. How should we make sure AI systems respect, acknowledge, and compensate the labor of individuals whose work is used to train AI models?

[REPLY]

Ensuring that the creator economy continues to be vibrant is an important priority for OpenAI. Writers, artists, composers and other creators have contributed immeasurably to societies throughout the history of civilization, and they are a vital part of American society and the American economy today. OpenAI is actively engaged in discussions with a wide variety of creators and content owners, geared toward finding mutually beneficial opportunities for creators and technology providers. Those discussions include a recognition by all parties that the technology is still in a nascent stage, and many creators continue to experiment with AI tools to assist in their creation of new works. A few examples:

Karen Cheng, an artist who uses OpenAI’s image generation tool to prompt the AI system to generate creative imagery overlaid to the rhythm of music in the background, created this DALL-E “music video.

Tim Boucher, a science fiction writer, has used a combination of AI tools to write a series of books in a volume driven format that previously would not have been possible.

Paul McCartney is using AI to create a final Beatles album.

Well, I’m at least impressed here that I upstaged McCartney somehow. And I appreciate this phrasing of a “volume driven format” instead of the less friendly “cheap book content” phrase included in the authors’ lawsuit against Anthropic.

However, I can confirm that when they say, “OpenAI is actively engaged in discussions with a wide variety of creators,” that so far I have not been one of them. I wouldn’t mind being one, though, I suppose. I am literally using their products at least a dozen times per day… If you’re reading, shoot me an email!

Updated Hollywood Reporter Piece

Following a complaint I submitted to their legal department, which is on-going, The Hollywood Reporter modified the reporting I wrote about here from the original version, which called me a “fraudster” to the new ending of the article which presently reads (underlines added by me to highlight changed text elements).

The authors also argue that Anthropic is depriving authors of book sales by facilitating the creation of rip-offs. When Kara Swisher released Burn Book earlier this year, Amazon was flooded with AI-generated copycats, according to the complaint. In another instance, author Jane Friedman discovered a “cache of garbage books” written under her name.

According to the lawsuit, authors have turned to Claude to generate “cheap book content,” and the complaint highlights an individual who have created dozens of books in a short period of time to make its case.

The authors claim that Anthropic used a dataset called “The Pile,” which incorporates nearly 200,000 books from a shadow library site, to train Claude. In July, Anthropic confirmed the use of the dataset to various publications, according to the lawsuit.

Anthropic didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Aug. 23, 9 am Updated to revise a paragraph within this story as well as include more detail from the complaint and remove an incorrect reference to author Tim Boucher.

Text from the Anthropic Lawsuit

I’ll go into more why I think this is wrong next week, but just wanted to capture the most relevant paragraphs from the latest class action lawsuit against Anthropic, which I am erroneously (I think) referenced in. Original PDF from the case.

  1. Since the explosion of LLM use in 2023, which coincided with the release of Claude, there has been an explosion of AI-generated books. When journalist Kara Swisher released her memoir Burn Book earlier this year, Amazon was flooded AI generated copycats. This was not an isolated incident. In another instance, author Jane Friedman discovered “a cache of garbage books” written under her name for sale on Amazon. As LLMs have become more advanced—and enabled to train on more and more copyrighted material—they are able to generate more content and more sophisticated content. The result is that it is easier than ever to generate rip-offs of copyrighted books that compete with the original, or at a minimum dilute the market for the original copyrighted work.
  2. Claude in particular has been used to generate cheap book content. For example, in May 2023, it was reported that a man named Tim Boucher had “written” 97 books using Anthropic’s Claude (as well as OpenAI’s ChatGPT) in less than year, and sold them at prices from $1.99 to $5.99.39 Each book took a mere “six to eight hours” to “write” from beginning to end. Claude could not generate this kind of long-form content if it were not trained on a large quantity of books, books for which Anthropic paid authors nothing.
  3. In short, the success and profitability of Anthropic is predicated on mass copyright infringement without a word of permission from or a nickel of compensation to copyright owners, including Plaintiffs here.

Page 23 of 205

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén