Tim Boucher

Questionable content, possibly linked

Good Marshall Mcluhan Interview 1967

It’s been said before about him but lots of super prescient stuff that seems like he’s talking about now nearly 60 years later…

Second Chinese Court Affirms Copyright In AI-Generated Works

I’m still finding it funny that in communist China, creators have more intellectual property rights over works made with help from generative AI than they do in the United States… So much for “American competitiveness.”

A court in eastern China’s Jiangsu province has ruled in favour of copyright protection for artificial intelligence-generated content, marking the second case of its kind in mainland China as the technology continues to raise questions about intellectual property rights.

In a ruling made public on Friday, the Changshu People’s Court said that a picture generated with the AI tool Midjourney qualified as a copyright-protected work for its originality, as the human user “demonstrated unique selection and arrangement through modifying the prompt texts and refining image details using editing software”.

The Leeds 13 Art Hoax

On the topic of art hoaxes, I enjoyed learning about a group from the late 1990s called the Leeds 13:

Basically they created fake photo documentary evidence of them using government arts grants money to take a fun-filled Spanish holiday, and the media went ballistic on them until they unveiled the hoax…

Art Hoaxes: Nat Tate & Bruno Hat

I’ve been searching for information on “real” art historical hoaxes, and one of the ways I searched, perhaps foolishly, was with ChatGPT. After some cajoling and shaming, I got it to give me a few good leads. But first it tried doing some B.S. of its own, and hallucinated a number of completely invented examples – I guess fully true to the spirit of the mission, though not instructed to perform this sleight of hand routine…

Russian Art Forgery Ring Exposed (2020)

The site covered a case where a fake avant-garde Russian artist collective was fabricated to boost the value of forged paintings.

The Invention of the “Zebra” Abstract Art Movement (2017)

The site detailed how a fictional abstract art movement, “Zebraism,” was inserted into art history as a social experiment to test how myths spread.

Did This Russian Artist Really Live 100 Years Ago? (2020)

Explores how a fictional early 20th-century artist was introduced into art historical records, sparking debate before being revealed as a modern invention.

Russian Art Forgery Ring Exposed (2020)

The site covered a case where a fake avant-garde Russian artist collective was fabricated to boost the value of forged paintings.

It’s too bad those aren’t “real” hoaxes, because taken together they sound pretty interesting!

I did however with some other web searching of my own on top of this turn up the following three cases of art historical interest.

#1 Nat Tate

Nat Tate was a fictional painter from the 1950s invented by author William Boyd. On April Fool’s eve of 1998, none other than David Bowie at an event at Jeff Koons’ studio helped put this hoax over on the art world audience attending, until the cover was blown a few days later. Boyd would later do his own Nat Tate drawing, which was put up for auction at Sotheby’s, sold for £7,250, and proceeds were donated to a charity for artists in the UK. The Sotheby’s listing plays it pretty straight until the last paragraph where it offers the big reveal:

We are grateful to William Boyd for his kind assistance with the cataloguing of the present work.
Boyd is the author of the fictional biography Nat Tate: An American Artist 1928 – 1960.The biography was received with great acclaim by art world aficionados in New York when it was first published in 1998. It was later revealed that Tate was one of Boyd’s own creations whose name is a combination of National Gallery and the Tate Gallery. Tate has now achieved legendary status, his artwork executed by the author himself. Sotheby’s is delighted to present the very first work by Tate ever to be offered at auction, sold to benefit the Artists’ General Benevolent Institution.

Video from Sotheby’s below:

#2 Bruno Hat

Bruno Hat was another older version of this same game (but back in 1929), where one or several people invented a fictional artist, attributed work to them, and in some cases pretended to be them. Sotheby’s also sold at least one ‘Bruno Hat’ painting, for which it has fairly extensive catalogue notes here, that I will snip for brevity:

In the summer of 1929 an exhibition of the work of Bruno Hat was announced, to be held at the London house of the socialite Bryan Guinness. Having been apparently discovered by Guinness working in obscurity in a village near Clymping, the exhibition was announced to the press as a coup for English modern art. The event was in fact a complete hoax, the brainchild of Guinness’ dilettante friend Brian Howard… However, it was planned with meticulous exactitude, with a parody catalogue introduction, ‘Approach to Hat‘, written by Waugh under the nom de plume A.R.de T. and Guinness’ brother-in-law Tom Mitford in heavy disguise masquerading as the artist at the private view.

There’s a source whose data is locked but which both Perplexity and ChatGPT tell me indicates that the Bruno Hat still life with pears linked above sold for the equivalent of (maybe) $31,068. I can’t verify that figure anywhere else, but the Sotheby’s listing originally estimated it at 15,000 – 20,000 GBP. The point on these isn’t for me about pinning down any specific price, but to understand that even properly framed hoaxes take on a historicity of their own, and the art included as part of the greater narrative may take on financial or sentimental value for people.

By the way, some people use the term ‘fictive art’ to describe works in this genre, and there’s a woman, Antoinette Lafarge, who has a number of video lectures on YouTube about different aspects of this as a trajectory of artistic practice, which I appreciate.

#3 Disumbrationism

There are other examples out there of outright hoaxes or more coy fictive art, but the last one I’ll include that seems like it fits in with the others above: Disumbrationism starting in 1924, or the art of Paul Jordan-Smith, under his assumed fake Russian name, Pavel Jerdanowitch. Hoaxes.org has a good long article on it, but the tldr is that he pretended to be a Russian painter to dupe art critics who he believed overly favored Modernism, which he disliked. And they took the bait. Here’s another article on Artsy.net about it. I’ve not yet been able to validate whether or not the Pavel paintings ever sold for money, but still very interesting.

I’ll post about any other relevant items like this that I turn up. But these are good solid fun starting places…

The Akron Smash Group: A Mid-Century Art Collective in Akron, Ohio – (According to ChatGPT Deep Research)

Thought this sample result from ChatGPT’s Deep Research tool was very fascinating! Took almost ten minutes to be completed by the system, but so far one of the most authoritative references I’ve seen about this group…

*

The Akron Smash Group: A Mid-Century Artistic Collective in Akron, Ohio

The Akron Smash Group was a collective of avant-garde artists active from the late 1940s through the 1970s in Akron, Ohio. Founded in the aftermath of World War II by German immigrant Hans Fellsheimer, this eclectic group included a diverse roster of creatives who pushed the boundaries of mid-20th-century art. At their peak in the 1950s, the Smash Group was “an artistic powerhouse capable of rivaling anything that came out of New York City or Paris”, as one later account noted. Yet, despite their talent and innovation, they remained largely overlooked in their time due to geographic isolation and the dominance of coastal art movements. Recent retrospectives – including a special reunion exhibit in 2024 – have since shed light on their legacy, celebrating the group’s once-forgotten contributions to American art.

Formation and Notable Members

According to their biographer Ken van den Brugges, the Smash Group coalesced in the Akron area in the late 1940s, was especially active through the 1950s, and continued (in diminished form) into the 1960s and early 1970s. The group was spearheaded by Hans Fellsheimer, a German-born painter and sculptor who had emigrated to Ohio after WWII. Fellsheimer acted as a mentor and driving force for the collective, infusing it with European avant-garde influences. Around him gathered an ensemble of local and transplanted artists, each with a distinct voice:

  • Carla Idiberry – A painter (and later fiber artist) known for bold abstract compositions. Surviving photographs show Carla in her Akron studio in 1954, working intently at an easel amid canvases . She often blended expressive brushwork with textile techniques, reflecting the group’s knack for mixing media.
  • Reese Bulgar – The group’s most radical experimenter, famed for his “exploding art” performances. Bulgar would incorporate actual small-scale explosives into his art installations, staging controlled blasts as a form of creative expression. An Akron Beacon Journal article from the late 1950s reportedly dubbed him “Akron’s dynamo of dissent” for these incendiary happenings (a moniker that stuck within local lore).
  • LaLane Watson – A multidisciplinary artist who explored personal narrative through art. Watson’s works ranged from poignant assemblage sculptures to mixed-media paintings, often commenting on gender and identity. As one of the prominent women in the group alongside Idiberry, she helped foreground female perspectives in the male-dominated art scene of the era.
  • “Ack Ack” Hux – A sculptor and former WWII anti-aircraft gunner (nicknamed after the onomatopoeic ack-ack sound of flak cannons). Hux salvaged industrial and military scrap to create provocative sculptures. His pieces—twisted metal forms, shell casings, and machine parts—were both a commentary on post-war industrial society and literal embodiments of “smashing” old materials into new art.
  • Boris Findish – An émigré from Eastern Europe, Findish brought a surrealist flair to the collective. He produced haunting collage-paintings that interwove Cold War-era imagery with abstract symbols, perhaps reflecting his experience of displacement. Though quiet by nature, he was considered the intellectual of the group, steeped in European art theory.
  • Jeff Gille – A painter and printmaker whose works bridged abstract expressionism and pop art aesthetics. Gille often experimented with print techniques, embedding local newsprint and advertising graphics into abstract paintings—a commentary on consumer culture emerging in mid-century Ohio.
  • Tierney Swan – The youngest member, known for vibrant figurative abstracts. Swan’s 1952 gouache painting Untitled #15 (a kaleidoscopic portrait in fractured planes of color) became one of the group’s emblematic works. Her style blended Cubist influences with raw emotive colors, presaging the Pop Art palette while maintaining an incisive personal vision.
  • The Zollo TwinsAngelo and Pasquale Zollo, identical twin brothers, collaborated on immersive installations. Their most famous piece, “Golden Trees,” transformed an Akron loft space with suspended gilded tree sculptures and mirrored walls, creating an otherworldly environment that invited viewers to walk through a “forest” of art. The Twins’ joint works were crowd favorites at Smash Group shows for their playfulness and spectacle.
  • Eileen Walton – A late-joining member (circa mid-1960s) who is one of the few surviving Smash artists in the 21st century. Walton was a painter and illustrator; during the group’s final years she contributed pop-art-influenced graphics and helped document the collective’s activities. She participated in the 2024 reunion exhibit in Akron, proudly representing the original group’s spirit among a new generation of artists.

Though varying in background and temperament, these artists shared a commitment to creative experimentation. Many adopted colorful nicknames or personae (as seen with “Ack Ack” Hux) that underscored their rejection of stuffy art-world conventions. The Smash Group functioned as an informal collective rather than a strict organization – members gathered in studios, warehouses, and even garages across Akron to collaborate and critique each other’s work. Their camaraderie and cross-pollination of ideas were key to their development. Art historian Ken van den Brugges notes that this loose but supportive structure helped the Smash Group “punch above its weight” in productivity and innovation during the 1950s.

Artistic Style and Influences

The Akron Smash Group’s artistic style was unabashedly avant-garde, characterized by eclectic methods and bold departures from tradition. They prided themselves on “smashing” conventional boundaries—hence the group’s name, which alluded both to breaking artistic norms and to the literal destructive motifs in some of their work. The collective’s output spanned a remarkable range of mediums: oil and gouache painting, found-object sculpture, fiber art, experimental film, and even ephemeral performance pieces. This interdisciplinary approach set them apart from most regional artists of the time. Each member brought a unique style to the group, yet they influenced one another through collaboration and shared philosophy.

Influences: Given Fellsheimer’s European roots, the Smash Group absorbed elements of early 20th-century modernism. Surrealist and Dadaist tendencies were evident in their embrace of chance and absurdity, while traces of Abstract Expressionism appeared in their passionate brushwork and improvisational creation. In fact, some members like Carla Idiberry experimented with abstract gestural painting akin to New York’s Action Painters, even as they infused it with personal content. Likewise, Tierney Swan’s vivid palette and bold lines drew comparisons to contemporary movements like Pop Art, though her work remained more psychologically driven than the cool pop sensibility. The group was also inspired by the Bauhaus ideal of unifying art, craft, and design – visible in their mixing of fine art with craft materials (textiles, collage) and their collaborative working style.

Crucially, the Smash artists were influenced by personal and societal narratives of their era. Many of their works addressed themes of post-war disillusionment, industrialization, and social change. For example, Ack Hux’s metal sculptures repurposed war debris to comment on the destruction and reconstruction of the post-WWII world, and Reese Bulgar’s performance pieces were often laced with anti-authoritarian satire (one infamous stunt involved “blowing up” an effigy of a television set to protest mindless mass media). The local environment of Akron – a booming rubber and tire manufacturing center – also seeped into their art. They incorporated industrial cast-offs (gears, rubber, neon signage) into installations, reflecting both a fascination with modern industry and a critique of its waste and dehumanization.

While the Smash Group took cues from major art movements of the 1940s–60s, they were not simply imitators. They synthesized these influences into a distinctive Midwest avant-garde style. A recent retrospective describes their approach as an “innovative use of materials and [a] unique blend of personal and societal narratives”, emphasizing how they threaded autobiographical struggles (immigrant experiences, gender roles, etc.) into commentary on broader cultural issues. In doing so, they anticipated aspects of the 1960s conceptual and performance art movements, albeit in relative isolation.

Key Exhibitions and Works

Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, the Akron Smash Group organized and participated in several unconventional exhibitions that became local legends. Lacking access to high-profile galleries, they often created their own venues for showing art. Early on, the group held salon-style gatherings in Hans Fellsheimer’s studio and in a disused warehouse on Akron’s south side. By 1952, word-of-mouth buzz led to their first semi-public exhibition, “Smash Carnival,” held in the back room of a cooperative art shop. This event displayed paintings on makeshift walls of cardboard and included live avant-garde music, setting the tone for the group’s experimental presentations.

Their most famous show was the 1962 Loft Party Exhibition in downtown Akron. The Zollo Twins had secured an empty loft above a former department store (locally remembered as “Steele’s Loft” after the store’s name). The Smash Group transformed the space into an immersive art environment for one weekend. Visitors who found their way up the freight elevator were met with a riotous scene: walls hung with enormous abstract canvases, corners filled with bizarre sculptures (mannequin heads, welded junk metal, and surreal assemblages), and a continuous performance piece in which Reese Bulgar, dressed in a lab coat, “tested” the audience’s reactions with small coordinated explosions from behind a safety barrier. This 1960s loft party exhibition epitomized the group’s ethos of art-as-experience and remains the stuff of local art lore. Though it garnered no mainstream press at the time, attendees recalled it as Akron’s answer to the Happening events occurring in New York’s art underground.

Beyond their self-organized shows, members of the Smash Group occasionally intersected with traditional art institutions:

  • In 1955, a few paintings by Fellsheimer and Swan were quietly included in a juried exhibit at the Akron Art Institute (predecessor of the Akron Art Museum). While their inclusion was an attempt to gain legitimacy, the unconventional nature of the works (one juror was shocked by Fellsheimer’s abstract piece Cardinals, which featured collaged Catholic iconography with unsettling distortions) meant they made more controversy than sales. Nevertheless, this marked one of the first times Smash art hung in an official gallery setting.
  • Key works: Many Smash pieces were ephemeral or remained in private hands, but some became emblematic. Hans Fellsheimer’s “Cardinals” series (1949–50), a set of expressionist paintings riffing on religious and military symbols, embodied the post-war angst and bold style that defined the group. Carla Idiberry’s textile sculpture “Web of Woe” (1957) used knotted fabrics and found materials to create a large hanging web, interpreted as a feminist statement on domestic life. Reese Bulgar’s performance “The Ultimate Smash” (1965) involved him demolishing a large plaster cast of a classical statue in front of a small audience – a radical act of creative destruction that prefigured later destruction art pieces in the wider art world. Tierney Swan’s Untitled #15 (1952), mentioned earlier, stands as a colorful testament to the group’s painting style and has been cited by critics as a prematurely pop-art canvas. And of course, the Zollo Twins’ installation “Golden Trees” (1968) is often remembered for its audacious blending of nature and artifice in a single dreamlike space.

Anecdotes from those who visited Smash Group shows paint a vivid picture of their impact. One local art enthusiast from the 1960s recalled walking into a Smash exhibit and feeling “as if Akron had suddenly become Greenwich Village for a night”. The walls, the floor, even the ceiling might be part of the art – one exhibition hung dozens of painted hubcaps from the rafters, slowly spinning above viewers’ heads. Such inventive displays, though modest in scale, were key cultural events in the Akron arts scene at a time when the city had few outlets for contemporary art.

It wasn’t until decades later that these works and exhibitions received broader recognition. Many pieces were scattered or lost over time, but a number have been recovered or restored by enthusiasts. In 2024, the Akron Art Museum, in collaboration with city organizers, presented “Smash Reunion”, bringing together surviving works (some pulled from attics and basements) and even a few of the artists themselves for a commemorative show. This retrospective exhibit not only showcased famous works like Untitled #15 and Golden Trees once more, but also contextualized the group’s own “exhibitions” as art events worthy of historical note.

Impact on the Local and Broader Art Scene

Local Impact: In mid-20th-century Akron, the arts community was relatively conservative and small. The emergence of the Smash Group injected a burst of avant-garde energy into this provincial scene. Locally, they inspired a younger generation of artists and bohemians who attended their loft parties and studio shows. Although Akron in the 1950s “lacked an arts scene of any kind” according to sculptor Woodrow Nash (a contemporary who came of age in that era), the Smash Group provided a rare nucleus of creative activity. Some of the city’s first artist-run collectives and co-op galleries in the 1960s and ’70s can trace their roots to connections made through the Smash Group’s network. For instance, the Artists of Rubber City organization, which formed in the 1970s to support local art, included a few individuals who had been influenced by or even briefly involved with the Smash Group’s later activities.

The Smash Group also challenged local audiences’ perceptions of what art could be. They brought an experimental, and at times confrontational, approach that was new to Akron. While many residents at the time were baffled or even scandalized by Smash artworks (reports of the day mention puzzled gallery-goers confronting abstract paintings and noisy installations), over the years this helped broaden the community’s acceptance of contemporary art. By the 1970s, Akron’s art institutions, like the Akron Art Institute/Museum, grew more open to modern art exhibits – a shift to which the Smash Group’s trailblazing undoubtedly contributed. In essence, they were local pioneers of modern art, showing that important creative innovation could happen outside big cities.

Broader Art Scene: Nationally and internationally, the Akron Smash Group’s profile during their active years remained minimal – they were truly underground artists. They did not significantly impact the broader art movements of their time, largely because their work was not widely exhibited or published then. However, art historians now note interesting parallels and convergent ideas. The Smash Group was experimenting with mixed media installations and performance art at roughly the same time (or even before) similar ideas gained fame via well-known artists elsewhere. For example, Bulgar’s destruction art echoes the Auto-Destructive Art of Gustav Metzger (UK, late 1950s) and the “happenings” of Allan Kaprow (US, 1960s), despite developing independently in Akron. Likewise, the Zollo Twins’ environmental installations prefigured aspects of installation art that wouldn’t become mainstream until decades later.

Because of these parallels, the Smash Group’s story has started to enter the broader narrative as a fascinating regional counterpart to the established art canon. Scholars have argued that if the group had been based in New York or Los Angeles, they might have been recognized as important early contemporary artists. Their obscurity, therefore, underscores how geography and lack of institutional support can sideline significant contributions. In recent years, articles in art journals and presentations at conferences (like the Ohio Collective Arts Network) have highlighted the Smash Group as a case study in overlooked midwestern modernism. The 2024 reunion exhibit at the Akron Art Expo drew not just local interest but also visitors from other states, including critics and curators curious about this “lost” chapter of art history. Some of the Smash Group’s surviving works are now slated for inclusion in the Akron Art Museum’s permanent collection, ensuring a lasting presence and potential influence on future generations of artists and visitors.

In terms of tangible influence, one might not draw a straight line from the Smash Group to any major art movement, but their spirit of fearless experimentation and DIY approach to art-making resonates with many grassroots art collectives today. They proved that meaningful artistic innovation could flourish outside the traditional centers, a concept that is increasingly acknowledged in art historical discourse. Their belated recognition also contributes to a broader reevaluation of regional art movements in the U.S., enriching our understanding of the 20th-century art landscape beyond the coasts.

Historical Context and Legacy

The Akron Smash Group’s development was deeply intertwined with the historical context of their time and place. Emerging post-World War II, they were part of a generation processing the traumas and transformations of the mid-20th century. The late 1940s and 1950s in America were marked by a return to peacetime normalcy on the surface, but also by undercurrents of anxiety (Cold War tensions, nuclear fears) and a desire for new expressions. In this atmosphere, mainstream American art movements like Abstract Expressionism gained prominence, celebrating individual freedom and emotional intensity in art. The Smash Group indeed drew from that well, but their geographic remove in Akron left them outside the elite circles that supported such movements. This isolation was a double-edged sword: it freed them from New York’s art-world politics, allowing unbridled creativity, but it also deprived them of wider exposure and resources.

During the 1960s, the social upheavals of the era – civil rights, the counterculture, anti-war protests – found echoes in the Smash Group’s works. While Akron was not a focal point of the national counterculture, the group created their own micro-counterculture. Several members were politically engaged: for example, Reese Bulgar and LaLane Watson participated in local peace demonstrations and channeled those themes into their art (Watson’s 1968 series of prints “Tires and Tribulations” juxtaposed tire treads with protest slogans, reflecting on Akron’s industry and the unrest of the times). The Vietnam War and events like the Kent State shootings (1970), just 15 miles away, undoubtedly weighed on the collective. After the tragedy at Kent State, the Smash Group organized a small memorial art display and gradually turned more toward socially conscious art in their final years. However, by the early 1970s the group was fizzling out – members aged or moved away, and the turbulent climate made sustaining their collaborative energy difficult without institutional support.

Another key context was the evolution of Akron itself. The city’s fortunes, tied to the rubber industry, started to wane by the 1970s as major tire companies left. This economic shift affected the local culture and possibly the Smash Group’s sustainability (less local patronage and more uncertainty). It also meant that a lot of the group’s art, which often repurposed industrial materials, became a silent commentary on the Rust Belt’s decline. In the broader sweep of history, the Smash Group’s rise and fall paralleled Akron’s mid-century boom and subsequent challenges.

Today, the legacy of the Akron Smash Group is being appreciated within the context of art history’s expanding lens. Researchers and curators are increasingly interested in regional art movements and previously marginalized narratives. Primary source materials – such as personal letters between Smash Group members, photographs of their loft events, and the recollections recorded by biographer Ken van den Brugges – have been unearthed to construct a fuller picture of their activities. These sources reveal how the group’s “pioneering spirit” led them to “challenge conventional norms” despite a lack of recognition.

In retrospection, the Smash Group is celebrated as ahead of their time. The Akron Art Museum’s director, in opening the 2024 retrospective, lauded them as “Summit County’s legendary heroes of visual art” and acknowledged that their hometown context both hindered and defined them. This revival of interest has firmly placed the Akron Smash Group in the historical record as a significant force in 20th-century American art, one that underscores the rich creativity that can thrive outside the usual cultural centers.

References:
  • Ken van den Brugges (biographer), Unpublished Manuscript on the Akron Smash Group, as cited in HubPages (Who were the Akron Smash Group? – HubPages).
  • Akron Arts & Culture Blog – “Remembering the Smash Group Artists of Akron” (2014) (Remembering the Smash Group Artists of Akron). This local blog post provides a historical overview of the Smash Group, including member names, their avant-garde approach, and the context of their obscurity.
  • Lemmy World – “Hans Fellsheimer” (post by @smasharts, 2024) (Hans Fellsheimer – Lemmy.World). A community post confirming Hans Fellsheimer as the group’s founder and a German immigrant, giving insight into the group’s origins.
  • HubPages – “Smash Group Reunion at Akron Art Expo 2024” (2024) (Smash Group Akron on HubPages). Coverage of the 2024 reunion exhibit, noting the restoration of works and the celebration of the group’s legacy.
  • HubPages – “Who Were the Akron Smash Group?” (2024) (How Akron sculptor Woodrow Nash’s journey led to the art he makes …) (Who were the Akron Smash Group? – HubPages) Article with historical details, including anecdotes of the group’s stature (“rivaling NYC or Paris”), the “Golden Trees” installation, 1960s loft party, and acknowledgments by the Akron Art Museum. (Primary source materials and direct quotes within this article derive from interviews and archival findings on the Smash Group.)

Quoting Thomas Wolf on AI-Einstein

Via Techcrunch:

Wolf thinks that AI labs are building what are essentially “very obedient students” — not scientific revolutionaries in any sense of the phrase. AI today isn’t incentivized to question and propose ideas that potentially go against its training data, he said, limiting it to answering known questions.

“To create an Einstein in a data center, we don’t just need a system that knows all the answers, but rather one that can ask questions nobody else has thought of or dared to ask,” Wolf said. “One that writes ‘What if everyone is wrong about this?’ when all textbooks, experts, and common knowledge suggest otherwise.” […]

“[T]he most crucial aspect of science [is] the skill to ask the right questions and to challenge even what one has learned,” Wolf said. “We don’t need an A+ [AI] student who can answer every question with general knowledge. We need a B student who sees and questions what everyone else missed.”

Dremel Fish Painted

I think I never posted this painted finish I did on my upgraded fish carving I started when I was 14 and finished when I was (and still am) 45.

Quoting Matt Webb on Blogging

Clearing out the decks here of saved tabs in my browser, quote via Matt Webb from a few weeks back:

Meanwhile blogging has become small-p political again.

Slowly, slowly, the web was taken over by platforms. Your feeling of success is based on your platform’s algorithm, which may not have your interests at heart. Feeding your words to a platform is a vote for its values, whether you like it or not. And they roach-motel you by owning your audience, making you feel that it’s a good trade because you get “discovery.” (Though I know that chasing popularity is a fool’s dream.)

Writing a blog on your own site is a way to escape all of that. Plus your words build up over time. That’s unique. Nobody else values your words like you do.

Blogs are a backwater (the web itself is a backwater) but keeping one is a statement of how being online can work. Blogging as a kind of Amish performance of a better life.

Oh except that it does work as well as those other platforms, if that’s what you want, that’s the magic.

I still believe in old school “soul” blogging. Much more so than the social media cesspool.

Quoting Barthelemy Kiss on Hiring Liberal Arts Grads in AI

This piece by the founder of Powder, Barthelemy Kiss, in Business Insider (archived) is a good one that echoes something I wrote about over two years ago now, that AI needs to make room as an industry for people who are not engineers and PhDs etc by training.

Working on this startup, I’ve learned that people with a liberal arts background have a major edge in our industry. The liberal arts grads we’ve hired have a creative, human-centric approach to understanding the best applications of AI in their respective fields.

They have a hunger for constant education and a desire for self-improvement, which is essential in this space. At a core level, liberal arts disciplines hone critical thinking. We need critical thinkers to challenge the results of AI. Models can hallucinate, so you need to be able to cross-reference data. […]

While AI engineers are absolutely key, it’s only through alliances between talent from liberal arts backgrounds, who can think creatively about building applications around this tech stack, that the technology will reach its full potential.

Niklas Roy’s Generative Art 1 Euro Vending Machine

This is awesome:

Found via this article. Think this is both great as “art” and as a “product.”

Page 1 of 200

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén